Home automation units based on X10/Insteon or proprietary systems like Control4 or Savant start at $100-200. At a time when you can buy a fully functional WiFi router with a 200+MHz processor, a minimum 8M of RAM, 16MB of flash for under $50, why is there not a home automation system that costs $50 and uses standard TCP/IP and WiFi for connectivity?
As I was browsing through Google News, I saw some particularly acrid editorials in the WSJ. Their Op-Ed pages have been the preserve of lunatics long before Rupert Murdoch acquired them, but you would think the markets’ fiasco and the general opprobrium of discredit raining upon Wall Street would lead them to some well deserved humility.
The press recycles worn clichés when it reports on volatility in the markets. Last week’s 700-point drop was a “collapse” and today’s 5% drop is a “meltdown”.
I’m sorry, but 30% is a meltdown and 50% is a collapse. 5% or 7% do not rate such excessive terms.
Some yahoo at Debian found what he thought was a bug in OpenSSL, and decided
to comment out some code without having any clue what purpose it served. That
purpose was to seed a pseudo-random number generator with entropy from memory,
specifically /dev/random. This only broke the cryptographic security of
OpenSSL on Debian (and thus Ubuntu) while being mostly
undetectable. It’s quite likely attacks of the same ilk were
deliberately planted by various spy agencies.
This is just an extreme example of why I prefer to build open-source software
from source code myself rather than trust blindly in some packager whose
choice of compile-time settings almost certainly doesn’t match mine. I
have a framework of makefiles that specify how each package is built from
source (meta-makefiles, really). This includes checking for new versions of
the package, setting configure options and make environment variables. For
instance, to fetch the most recent version of OpenSSL, all I do is make sync-openssl; make openssl then as root run make install-openssl. The
maintenance burden is low as I have been assembling these metamakefiles over
the last 12 years, targeting Solaris and OS X. The end-result is a
deterministic build according to my specifications.
My process would not ward against a malicious attack like Brian Kernighan’s notorious trusting trust attack, but it has served me well over the years.
Why are Untied Airlines, American and Delta still referred to as “full-service airlines” and Southwest as “no-frills”? As far as I am concerned, it is exactly the opposite. Southwest has leather seats, provides in-flight snacks for free, does not gouge you for checking bags, and if they screw up they will make it right and offer you vouchers in compensation. The so-called premium airlines won’t.